Beyond VMware
A Strategic Guide to Evaluating Hypervisor Alternatives
With changes in the virtualisation market, many organisations are reviewing their options.
Central can help you assess your current environment, compare alternative platforms and build a practical roadmap for what comes next.
Inside the guide:
- Compare VMware, Hyper-V and Proxmox
- Understand real-world cost differences
- Evaluate migration risks and considerations
- Identify the right platform for your environment
The numbers.
Frequently asked questions
Why are organisations moving away from VMware?
Following Broadcom’s acquisition, many organisations have seen significant increases in licensing costs alongside a shift to bundled subscription models. This has prompted IT leaders to reassess whether VMware still delivers the best value for their environment.
What are the main alternatives to VMware?
The most commonly evaluated alternatives are Microsoft Hyper-V and Proxmox VE. Each offers a different balance of cost, capability and operational complexity, depending on your existing infrastructure and in-house expertise.
Is Microsoft Hyper-V a viable replacement for VMware?
Yes, for many organisations Hyper-V provides a strong balance of enterprise capability, cost efficiency and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. It is particularly well-suited to Windows-centric environments and hybrid cloud strategies.
Is Proxmox suitable for production environments?
Proxmox is increasingly being adopted in production, particularly in cost-sensitive or Linux-focused environments. However, it requires the right internal skillset and careful consideration around support models and integrations.
How much can you save by moving away from VMware?
Cost reductions can be significant, particularly for mid-market environments. However, the overall saving depends on factors such as licensing, migration effort, tooling and long-term operational requirements.